Rationale

• Non-statistical cost-effective method of eliciting feelings and attitudes toward issues.
• Can yield valuable insight into the problems the jury will face during deliberation.
• Far less complicated than the more cumbersome mock trial.
• Excellent method for evaluating litigation issues and obtaining immediate feedback.
• Valuable forum for learning the worth/strength of your case.

Description

• 30-40 individuals (gathered randomly from the voter rolls, usually in an adjoining county to avoid contacting actual jurors) are presented unbiased facts and issues of the case for discussion.
• Case summaries are presented similar to trial simulations but with less of the drama and trappings of the actual courtroom.
• Opening statements are usually delivered and a key witness or two may be examined and cross-examined and closing statements given.
• Format can vary - time frame is usually 4-5 hours.
• Upon completion of all presentation the individuals are divided into three groups and talk informally about the pros and cons of the issues and facts.
• Outcomes are plotted on spreadsheets and statistically analyzed.